Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RPP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Continued editwarring on infobox image, open discussion on talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    If we full-protect it, it will mean that when that full protection expires all protection will end as it is not currently possible to layer two levels of protection. I can set a W-Ping to reset it, but this will likely mean there will be some period where the article is completely unprotected. Would you be OK with this possibiility? Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I always set pending changes in these situations, which act as insurence for a period there is no other protection. Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: A user with a red nickname constantly deletes information from the source, adding information without a source Dushnilkin (talk) 07:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism. NumberjacksFan2024 (talk) 09:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism JeanMercier90 (talk) 14:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New target of HoY Piermark. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No disruption in the last two days. Come back if it resumes. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: IPs will not discuss on talk page about adding content that goes against the manual of style . Mike Allen 19:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and IP vandalism. Skitash (talk) 20:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Second time disruptive editing is happening after the protection removed. Need to protect the page for longer time. Mehedi Abedin 21:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism by multiple IPs. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 21:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Frequent pious, wishful-thinking, and nonacademic intervention Temerarius (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Frequent pious, wishful-thinking, and nonacademic intervention Temerarius (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined: not enough recent disruption. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Frequent pious, wishful-thinking, and nonacademic intervention Temerarius (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Sock edits spanning half a month; see page history. ZZZ'S 22:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: Create protection is no longer required because the page will be redirected to Royal Match. The company is not notable enough for its own article, but is best known for its creation of the game. This is the result of an AFC/R request. Original administrator has not been active since April, and a timely response is unlikely. Garsh (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Protected for over a decade. However, both of the page protectors are likely inactive. Consider downgrading protection level and set a time limit?102.106.191.176 (talk)

    Question: Agree the disruption that led to the AfD being protected has long since ceased. But curious why anyone would need to edit this closed AFD from 2011. The deleted article title (VIBES FM Hamburg) is not protected so is theoretically available for recreation if the subject has since become notable. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC) Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment: There's no reason to edit it, so why unprotect it? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Let me ask you this then: why won't you at least let EC users fix Linter Errors in case if they notice any?102.106.191.176 (talk) 07:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Does it have any? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sumanuil It's clean from all lint* error types that we regularly fix and I don't see any reason to need to edit that page for lint reasons.
     * The one "issue" that you'll see listed there in the lint info, "night-mode-unaware-background-color", is more a tracking category than a lint error, and it is predominantly being left alone by the experienced delinting editors since we don't really agree with WMF for it's classification as lint, and since the issues are not well defined with a high rate of false flags. Until then, those issues are to be ignored. Zinnober9 (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting reducing protection level of the page from extended confirmed to Semi-protection. Since the candidate lists is incomplete, and election issues and party campaigns sections are completely empty, more editors are needed to update the article. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Not unprotected: you can discuss this with the protecting administrator at User talk:Daniel Quinlan if you want, but this protection is a contentious-topics restriction and can't be undone here (see WP:CTOP#Appeals and amendments). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    "On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including British, Polish, Australian, and Irish nationals, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" is incorrect and should be reworded as

    "On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including a dual US-Canada national, a Palestinian, three British citizens, an Australian, and a Pole, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" as per [1], [2]. 148.75.59.49 (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I would like to request that... (date of death is updated to 30/11/2024) . Jamesington (talk) 23:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.