Talk:Buzzword

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

List of buzzwords was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 October 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Buzzword. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics High‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 January 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Nobody is going to confuse “buzzword” with “Buzzwole”[edit]

Pokémon fans already know that the Pokémon in question’s name is not buzzword, people who don’t know much about Pokémon won’t even know that Buzzwole exists Cretaceousa (talk) 02:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Buzzword bingo[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of the discussion was not merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have major concerns whether Buzzword bingo is a notable concept, but instead of trial by fire at AfD, how about we consider merging it here first? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, given that the referenced support independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agreement with @Klbrain. They are two different topics, and cannot mutually support each other in one article. I also disagree that it is a article suitable for AfD, as it seems to be a notable topic and has a quite few references. Apologies for the late reply. Explodicator7331 (talk) 19:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per previous arguments. The topic is different and both are notable. PhotographyEdits (talk) 12:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

History[edit]

Roman common people (average folks) 2603:9000:2503:E79B:8D6E:69F3:F30F:3D4E (talk) 22:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

I've boldly removed the unreferenced terms from this list, since they're apparently words that someone was tired of hearing at the moment and not anchored in any linguistic analysis or critical review. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]